i take comfort from humour. and truth.

Everyone I know flails around, kvetching and growing despondent, on the way to finding a plot and structure that work. You are welcome to join the club.

— Anne Lamott, "Bird by Bird"

loss of dignity

Jane Espenson writes about removing dignity as a writing tactic:

Loss of dignity is hilarious.

…But the fact that something dignified is made laughable… well, we all know that that can be tragic, too. The kind of humor I've been talking about is just a few degrees skewed from poignancy, a point well understood by anyone who's ever had the misfortune to get very angry while wearing a chipmunk costume.

ten ways to beat procrastination

I have finely honed procrastination skills, and they're pretty much always at the fore. Tricking myself out of procrastinating is an endless process which constantly requires new weapons in the arsenal. Any time one tactic stops working, it's time to bring in a different big gun. Off the top of my head, here's ten of them1:

Read more »

  1. And by all references to "you" in the list I, naturally, mean "me" ;) []

brooding

The ever-so-clever Rju has a post up about the momentum behind not writing:

The hardest thing isn't to write – it's to keep writing.

I'd quote more, but there isn't anything snippetable without stealing the entire passage. Suffice to say, that final Brood. Brood. Brood. made me want to both grind my teeth and laugh, it was so right.

it's just a loose connection

Six months later, I can't tell what I wrote on a good or bad day. What seems to be true is the juices are always there. We lose our connection to them.

Michael Cunningham

That would be the quote which met me when I logged in to the site. Synchronicity is a very strange thing, and we are extremely good at recognising patterns and clues… And there's a common saying about looking a gift horse in the mouth. (And a rather less common one along the lines of examining things too deeply. Unless you're me, in which case it's quite commonly levelled at you. Er, me. Right.)

I'm beginning to think I can't revise the first novel and write the second novel at the same time. (Any who feel like piping up with I told you so, thank you, duly noted.) It's two different mind sets, both in terms of the stories themselves and also in terms of one requiring first draft head and the other requiring extensive editing head. They're not mixing well. What happened to all the time? It's a good thing Doctor Who wasn't a writer; he'd've wasted all his centuries of natural life getting all those novels written, and imagine the string of disasters that wouldn't've been averted then. Yes, I realise I'm making no sense.

For some who are making more sense lately, here, have some links:

  • Sandra McDonald talks about self-referentiality in the sff genre:
    I often have the feeling that we in sf/f are speaking to ourselves, to each other, but not to the mainstream. Which is where most of my friends and family live.

  • LanguageHat joins the campaign to rename the passive voice. I must say I like hyptic.
  • Ursula Vernon reflects on the fact that no art is wasted:

    Good projects strip the bad ones for nutrients. Old projects break down gently into useful bits that you dump on the roots of new projects.

    Even the bad art has its uses. Maybe especially the bad art. After all, it's the nastiest gunk that makes the best fertilizer.

  • And, in case you don't read Paperback Writer, she's issued an ebook challenge:

    write and publish a new short story, novellette, novella, or novel of your own in e-book form* and post it for download on your weblog, web site, or any host site on October 31, 2006.

    When Halloween arrives I will post a list of links here on PBW to the e-books of everyone who completes the challenge. I will also pick twenty e-books at random from all those who participate in the challenge and give the authors a private critique of their work via e-mail (so if you ever wanted me to read something of yours, this would be a definite shot.)

    Just keep in mind that, if you decide to participate, you're giving away your first rights to the piece.

letter from kelly link

Kelly Link, resident editor at the OWW, has written a letter to workshop members, which Charlie has posted at his blog.

The only kind of critique that I worry about, in the long run, is the tendency of a workshop to sand off all the interesting edges from a writer.

and it's pushing me aside, see it stretch on forever

Max woke me this morning staaaaahrving and demanding breakfast. (For reference, it was 7:20. I normally feed him at 7:00. Clearly, he was suffering.) I staggered upright and upstairs and discovered, lo and behold, he'd actually already been fed a hearty meal. 'S just that he thought it wasn't quite enough, and maybe I could rectify that. I didn't, but as a peace offering I let him eat the dregs of my breakfast (VitaBrits). He then finished off the other cat's breakfast. (She had started it earlier but, what with him making noises like slapping wet fish on soggy sponges somewhere below her [he's a noisy eater], she couldn't possibly keep on.) So, three breakfasts. I spent the morning nursing one very dense kitten. Whose head was daubed with VitaBrit mush.

And today there was progress on the writing. Real progress, even though the wordcount was not phenomenal. Because, as Greg points out, the count isn't everything. Thinking counts1. Today, to break the rut I've been in on the stuckened stories, I went back to one of my Clarion stories. My week six story, to be precise, the one about the shedding. It's been sitting on my hard-drive, comments entered in, and a third of it revised, since January. (Well, since February last year, technically; although I don't know when I got all the comments entered. That stuff takes forever.) Because it needed one or two new scenes, and I could come up with snippets of them but I couldn't get any further. Today I figured out how to shoehorn one of the new scenes in to the current arc, and so I am happy 8)

Things rise and fall for no reason. And what a great opportunity that is! You can start writing again at any minute.

Natalie Goldberg, Writing Down the Bones

  1. All of my Clarion teachers would like me to add the qualifier as long as it leads to writing. Natch. []

and the angels will weep for you

Today, all I want to do is watch Garden State. Sadly, I do not have a copy of it handy, and so looks like I'll be thwarted in that want yet another day.

Also today, after an hour and a half spent fighting for words during which I spectacularly achieved zero, count them zero, I gave up on the writing for a bit and sat down with Natalie Goldberg's Writing Down the Bones. It's been on my shelf for a whiles now, but since I'm also reading another book on the craft of writing, I had been intending to steer clear of more tomes of advice. There's only so much reading fiction and reading about writing you can do and still keep a balance of getting your own writing done.

And now I'm wishing I'd picked this book up aeons ago. I sat and read for nearly two hours, and I would've made it further than halfway if I'd let myself stop and simply read — but I couldn't, I had to keep stopping to scribble down snippets. To reinforce them, and to keep them for later.

Very early in the book, in talking about writing practice, Goldberg states:

When you write, don't say "I'm going to write a poem." That attitude will freeze you right away. Sit down with the least expectation of yourself; say "I am free to write the worst junk in the world." You have to give yourself permission to write a lot without a destination.

(emphasis mine)

I've seen this advice before, in the form of Give yourself permission to write a shit first draft — but that last line, about writing without a destination, suddenly unpacked a whole new level of this advice for me. Writing a cruddy first draft is all very well, because it's not about deliberately sitting down to write crud: it's about writing through self-doubts and lack of trust and perspective.

But lately it hasn't been working so fully for me, and Goldberg's snippet above unpacked why. Because letting myself write crap isn't my current rut. It's writing to a (frustratingly, stubbornly unknown) destination that's got me stuck at the moment.

My first novel was easy (said with hindsight ;) ) in that I knew the ending, and had only to cast backwards to find a beginning which would lead up to it. The current second novel (both of them ;) ) have only given me the beginning, and refuse to cough up more. Every short story I have on the burner at the moment is playing the same cat and mouse game.

So it's time for one of those insidious and yet oh-so-helpful little writers lies. I'll take up Goldberg's practice writing, for a half-hour or so a day after work; and then when I sit down to the proper wordcount, I'll tell myself that I'm writing entirely without a destination and any direction will do. And if the sneaky, snarky backbrain starts whispering sly truths about that nebulous outline lurking on my hard-drive, I shall turn up the iPod so I can't hear it.

It is important to have a way worked out to begin your writing; otherwise, washing the dishes will become the most important thing on earth — anything that will divert you from writing. Finally one just has to shut up, sit down, and write. That is painful. Writing is so simple, basic, and austere. There are no fancy gadgets to make it more attractive. Our monkey minds would much rather discuss our resistances with a friend at a lovely restaurant or go to a therapist to work out our writing blocks. We like to complicate simple tasks. There is a Zen saying, "Talk when you talk, walk when you walk, and die when you die." Write when you write. Stop battling yourself with guilt, accusations, and strong-arm threats.