Aug 292010
 
debblogpassoutofsaga

Today I have a special present for you all: a guest post by the redoubtable Tessa!

Tessa is one of the authors featured in Baggage, which will be launched at Borders, South Wharf (20 Convention Center Place), Thursday 2 September 2010 1-3pm. Having read Tessa's contribution to the anthology (several times) I can promise it will be bursting at the seams with literary goodness and well worth your time.

Tessa offers the following introduction for the blog post:

After hearing about Deb's experiences in Mongolia, and the observations she made of the land, I pondered my own experience in Tibet. It led my thoughts down some interesting paths, the general gist of which is here.

So without further ado!

The road between Lhasa and Mount Kailash knows no trees. No bushes, shrubs, low-lying growth. There are rocks. The ones of any size tend to be embedded in mountain flanks. The mountains themselves are of dimensions that defy adjectives.

The land there is eternal. The mountains of such stature as to forever redefine what I think of as 'mountain'. Between them are valleys of equal span, long graceful crescents carved out by glaciers of such size that the memory of their ghost still makes me shiver. Between the Himalayas — a sight that you cannot imagine or begin to imagine, something I can say with authority now having imaginings both pre- and post-Himalayas — and the Trans-Himalayan Range are vast stretches of nothing. Dust and rocks, dust grinding rocks down to sand, sand dunes worked by the wind down to a fine dust. Without trees and buildings hemming the horizon in, the sky is bewilderingly limitless.

The whole place just did my head in.

I have spent my whole life in one style of terrain; the suburbs. Specifically old and outer northern Melbourne suburbs, an area that was settled early, that is full of huge blocks of land and was developed when space was less of an issue. It was bushland originally. The trees were not uniformly razed, as seems to be practice now, the area is still quite dense bush. I fear a fire going through the place. In my childhood home alone there are seven massive gum trees, and we cut a couple down over the years. I’m used to a sky filtered through leaves, always broken and shifting.

Hills too. I’m not accustomed to flat land. Not only in regards to slopes, but terraforming too; roads tend to fit themselves to hills, and so I am not used to straight lines of sight for any real length.

My life is one of close horizons. No horizons at all, in fact. With all the trees, curves and slopes, my sense of distance is heavily skewed. I assume, not wrongly when in context, that if I can see it, it is in easy walking distance. Half an hour max.

Tibet fooled me over and over. Distance and size conspired to slap my suburban assumptions upside the head every time I gazed at the world, which was all day, every day.

One moment I distinctly remember was admiring a particularly elegant moraine smoothed in a mountain ridge. It eased its way between two peaks, a beautiful even slope that, in the middle of all the jagged cliffs and furious rocky outcrops, was like a slow sleepy roll over.

It would be a great walk, I caught myself thinking. All that flat ground with no rocks, an easy stroll to the top. We could stop the 4WD right here and start now.

And then my perspective shifted: the mountains and moraine were actually miles away, and yet despite the distance managed to fill the entire car window so that I had to press my face against the glass to see the tops, and that gentle slope only looked gentle but was actually, now I was seeing things for what they were, massive and steep and attempting to climb it – as it would be a climb, not a walk – it would whup my posterior.

When you experience such realisations every day for days on end, it tends to shift the ground you stand on internally.

Tibet is not easy, and while it is not actively out to kill you, it will do so any way. Australia has the same potential within it; the deserts, the myriad of animals that will poison you for looking at them the wrong way, issues with water. Being a child of the suburbs, I recognise that, but have absolutely nothing to do with it. Other than never walking outside in bare feet, I can safely assume that the world I live in is easy, and conquerable, and I will come to no harm.

I cannot see for any great distance, therefore, the world is not so much bigger than I.

Tibet would not let me be anything other than tiny and insignificant and fragile. The land is simply so vast, everything so majestic, I could be nothing at all amidst its grand and yet subdued glory. Any sense of ego and importance, all of the personal rights we decide we have when navigating our private lives, these things too are rendered small to the point of pointlessness.

It is said that the Tibetan people are the friendliest and most charitable in the world. I hesitate to approach such a statement, as it is in danger of becoming a cliché. They are people, and as individuals each has the capacity to be only human, and flawed as humans are.

But as a people, as a culture and as a religion, I can see how the land they live upon has shaped their character. There is a humbleness and lack of presumption about them that can only be shaped by a world that is much larger than them, and pays no heed to them at all. A gentleness and generosity born of an understanding that to live in such a world, such characteristics are fundamental necessities. And lastly, a playfulness that comes from being surrounded by wonders and miracles, and not taking them for granted.

I am a child of the suburbs. Sitting here at my window, I can see down to the train line, as far as the stretch of trees on the other side. It’s a five minute walk, an easy victory not even worth the conquest, and full of small miracles and wonders that I so take for granted I cannot even see them.

Aug 262010
 

In pondering the finer details of the Shadow Bound launch, there were some ideas that seemed OMG genius! on the face of it but which … didn't quite work out according to plan. In the interests of entertaining you, I thought I might share a couple of them with you.

One was that, in an attempt to decorate the room, I thought I might draw some golem characters. Good idea, no? Clay plays a pretty key role in Shadow Queen, after all, and there are even more golems in Shadow Bound, and I could draw a range of comic, cute and choleric golem faces to leer down at us from the walls.

And then I remembered … I can't really draw.

No, really. I'm not being humble. I have some rudimentary, grade-school skill, but it's simply not up to anything more than entertaining my brain during office meetings. My first attempt at drawing Clay's face made him, um, a girl. Oops? My second and third and fourth attempts did not produce any great leaps of artistic progress. If I had a good few years of daily practice between now and the book launch, I might have some hope of delivering hand-drawn golems for your entertainment, but as it is … yeah. Not so much.

So instead I'll be relying on the redoubtable Les Petersen's book covers to prettify the room. You can all thank me later.

The other idea — which would totally be genius, if we had the time to make it work, and if the Melbourne Convention Centre wasn't imposing a ban on the bringing-in of food they didn't supply, was to bake an enormous golem 'biscuit'.

This story I'll relate to you as it was related to me: in text message form. With photos.

Adorable. Yet horrific.

He fell over in the heat. He's weeping butter. This is…not really working.

I have no way of knowing if his bowels are cooked. This operation? Total buttergeddon.

So sadly there won't be an enormous golem 'biscuit' which I can use to inflict death-by-butter on you all :(

Aug 232010
 

So, AussieCon is fast approaching, so fast that this weekend saw the preliminary program issued. And, since it's not only in Australia but in my new hometown I, like others of far more important note, shall be there.

Not just wandering the corridors, wearing an expression somewhere between bewildered and panicked (depending upon how recently I've eaten and how confusing or maze-like the convention centre proves to be), but doing, you know, authorly things.

Saturday, 3:00pm (Room 203): Shadow Bound book launch
Shadow BoundCome along and see the little book be officially set free. The ever-gracious Sean Williams will be launching the book, there will be food (and since Matilde spends an inordinate amount of time cooking and describing food in both Shadow Queen and Shadow Bound, I'm thinking of trying to pick catering options that are in keeping with her world), and I'm bending my mind to coming up with some kind of lucky door prize into the bargain.

For catering purposes, I need some indication of numbers planning on attending, so if you think that includes you, please let me know, either here or by email.

Note for non-convention-goers: Since the book launch is going to be held as part of the convention, you would normally need to purchase an attending membership, or a day membership. However, there is some provision for allowing non-convention members to attend book launch events. If you live in Melbourne, or will be in Melbourne on Saturday 4 September 2010, and would like to attend the book launch without purchasing a membership, please contact me, either through the blog or by email, as I may be able to get your name on the door. The amount of names I get on the door in this fashion will be limited, so if you're interested, speak up!

Saturday, 4:00pm (Room 204): Finding the right voice: accents and speech patterns
When representing different accents and ways of speaking in fiction, some authors choose to add the occasional slang term or flourish while others go to the lengths of writing entire novels in a vernacular accent. How much is too much? Is it worth sacrificing readability for authenticity? Tips, strategies and techniques for accurately representing speech in fiction.

I don't know that I'm an expert on this, and I don't know what in the way of trips, strategies or techniques I'll be able to offer you, but I promise to at least THINK about the subject between now and the con, so that when I ramble on at you all on the day it'll be in a considered way. Or something.

Sunday, 2:00pm (Room 201): Kaffeklatsch
This is your chance to come and meet me, and chat to me, in a small group. I've never done one of these before, so I have no idea what goes down, but as far as I understand it's just a casual chat. So if you've always wanted to ask me something, or perhaps yell at me for the ending of Shadow Queen that left you hanging for a year, waiting to find out what happened, this is your chance!

Sunday, 3:00pm (Room 201):Signing
This one pretty much speaks for itself. I'll be signing. It's probably best if you bring along copies of books I've written, or to which I've contributed a story, but heck if you want me to sign something else who am I to quibble?

Sunday, 4:00pm (Room 207): Reading
Me. Some of my work (I'm not sure which work, exactly, yet). My (hopefully not quaking with terror) voice. And an audience (that would be you).

 Posted by at 8:44 pm
Aug 192010
 

I'm an introvert.1

These days, thanks to tests like the Myers-Briggs, extroversion vs introversion is seen as a sliding scale rather than an either/or scenario. Which I mention only so you know that, in calling myself an introvert, I don't mean I'm a little bit I-wards of the centre, or leaning more I than E. I mean introverted in the classic sense. I mean I work and hang with introverts who look positively extroverted by comparison. On that sliding scale, I am the endpoint.

I am what Huck Finn would term a lonesome person.2 I'm happy with my own thoughts, and my own company — that's plenty loud and crowded for me. (Heck, sometimes it's loo loud and crowded for me.) Spending time with other people — even fun, relaxing, enjoyable time — takes energy. Half an hour in the company of others means I need at least half an hour alone to recharge. There are some select few people — soothing, quiet, undemanding types — I can have around while I'm recharging. But even then the process is slower, less efficient. It's like trying to charge your ipod while simultaneously listening to it: the drive's still spinning, sipping juice out of the batteries even as they're trying to fill. So sometimes I need a break even from them.

All of which can be difficult, because society is built around the extroverts.

Now, to be fair, this is because we introverts don't speak up. But what it means is that we have a social system built not only around valuing the traits of the extrovert (self-confidence, speaking up, taking the lead, shining in the limelight, entertaining others), but also around "fixing" those who don't have or display these traits strongly enough.

But you know what? Fuck that.

Introversion is not a disease.

Just because I'm not jumping up and down for attention, or putting my hand up to join another committee that as far as I can see will argue itself to extinction, doesn't mean I'm not contributing.

Know what I'm doing, so quietly you can't hear or even see me at it?

I'm working. While all the limelighters are making noise for change, and rallying the troops to participate in goal-setting, I'm at my desk, getting the job done. Me personally, I'm working fast and thorough and to an exacting quality standard, because I'm a perfectionist. I'm not doing it uninterrupted, either. I'm holding someone's hand while they cry, because they know I'm a good listener. Or I'm nursemaiding someone else through a tricky learning task, because while I hate teaching in a classroom that doesn't mean I can't teach and in fact I'm damn good at tutoring, one on one. And I'm doing all of this with one hand tied behind my back, because apparently being introverted means I'm damaged, or not living up to my potential, and I need fixing.

Because introverts bother extroverts. Confoundingly, we find solitude not the distracting, tiresome burden that extroverts find it, but instead some kind of glorious release. And even though we don't fit into the system, we confusingly never bother to challenge it directly, instead sitting mulishly silent and living beneath and around its rules as best we can, letting it steam-roll on by so we can get on with what we really want to do, which is pursuing a different dream, in peace.

Which — to my mind, by my yardstick (the only yardstick I'm interested in heeding) — takes chutzpah.

Dear extroverts: I LIKE me this way. I don't need fixing, or curing, or saving.

Kindly adjust your perceptions of me, you, and the world, accordingly.

  1. Right now, even those who don't know me well will be thinking, Um, yeah, that's hardly news, Deb… []
  2. For those of you who've not read the book, or don't remember it, Huck distinguishes between lonely and lonesome. A lonely person is melancholy at being without company; a lonesome person is a habitual loner because he likes it, and seeks solitude. [The two, I note, are not mutually exclusive. A lonesome person can still be lonely.] []
Aug 162010
 

I have a love-hate relationship with chewing gum.

One of the guys at work always has these strange brands of gum, with highbrow flavours. He particularly favours minty orange, which I'll grant you is surprising at first, but delicious. And every now and then I steal some off him because, well, for example, lunch needs to be fought back against.

And every single time — every. single. time. — I arrive at the point where the delicious flavour has all but faded, and then past that point to where even the random interrmittent bursts of flavour are a thing of the past.

This is the point where you realise you are, indeed, chewing … GUM.

And you can't even get all righteously indignant and/or disappointed over it. Because it's in the name.

These chewing gum manufacturers and their nefarious honesty. It's diabolical.

Aug 142010
 

People, it's ALIVE.

It, in this case, being the podcast of my short story "The Wages of Salt".


Squatting to examine a buried shadow, I nodded. There was no academic or scientific value in salt — it would not advance my thesis, nor bring any glimmer of knowledge about the theriomorphs — but it would sell. White gold, the economic cornerstone of New Persia.

I brushed at the crust. Dirty grains clung to the sweat of my palms. The shadow underneath, too clean-edged to be a phantasm, didn’t change. “Here,” I said. “Help me.”

“It’ll just be another ammonite.” But he knelt and set to scraping beside me.

My fingers touched cloth.

I jerked back, staring at the dark linen we’d uncovered. Suspicion lifted the hairs on my nape and I dug faster, harder, in danger of damaging the specimen with haste.

An arm emerged from the salt. Beside me, Hareem had uncovered a knee. Working feverishly now, we followed the contours, salt flying from our fingers, until the entire body lay bare to the sky.

Hareem let out a low whistle. “Now this,” he said, “will fetch a fiefdom.”

So, if you couldn't get hold of a copy of Postscripts, or you really have a hankering for audio fiction, or heck if you simply like free fiction, trot yourself on over to PodCastle and enjoy.

 Posted by at 4:13 pm  Tagged with:
Aug 102010
 

I snapped this at the top of Chuluut Canyon.

I'd expected to spend the walk peering after fossils and petroglyphs, which I'd heard could be seen in these parts. Instead I received a detailed lesson (complete with quiz) in distinguishing which animal had produced each of the various type of faeces we passed. (I was not, in point of fact, particularly good at this quiz.)

Aug 012010
 

Chemically speaking, a catalyst is a substance that initiates or accelerates a reaction without itself being affected.

Which is correct, as far as it goes, but it's also a reductionist view.

The catalyst may appear unchanged from its initial state, but nevertheless it participates in the reaction. The reactants adhere to its surface, and squirm inside its pores. They shed an electron here, two there, dropping the detritus of their old form and using the catalyst to re-shape themselves into a new incarnation. They borrow the catalyst's stability and strength, plundering its interior as a means to an end.

Then they jump. Tearing themselves from the catalyst, dropping into the freedom of their shiny new form, they are butterflies climbing free of their caterpillar cocoons. They leave nothing behind, physically at least.

But the catalyst remembers. She lost some of herself, however briefly, to fund that transformation. They squirmed across the surface of her and burrowed into her capillaries, those caterpillars turned butterflies, those atoms in search of a new molecular pairing. It was by her power they were granted their new direction, and the strength and energy to pursue it.

They changed her, too, however briefly.