May 302006
 

Australian arts blog Articulate interviews Ellen Datlow:

There are lots of good stories published but they may not be all that memorable. For me to choose a story for the Year's Best it has to hold up on more than one level and be satisfying for more than one reading.

The article also discusses (briefly) the state of publishing. Go. Lookee.

 Posted by at 7:45 am  Tagged with:
May 292006
 

Max woke me this morning staaaaahrving and demanding breakfast. (For reference, it was 7:20. I normally feed him at 7:00. Clearly, he was suffering.) I staggered upright and upstairs and discovered, lo and behold, he'd actually already been fed a hearty meal. 'S just that he thought it wasn't quite enough, and maybe I could rectify that. I didn't, but as a peace offering I let him eat the dregs of my breakfast (VitaBrits). He then finished off the other cat's breakfast. (She had started it earlier but, what with him making noises like slapping wet fish on soggy sponges somewhere below her [he's a noisy eater], she couldn't possibly keep on.) So, three breakfasts. I spent the morning nursing one very dense kitten. Whose head was daubed with VitaBrit mush.

And today there was progress on the writing. Real progress, even though the wordcount was not phenomenal. Because, as Greg points out, the count isn't everything. Thinking counts1. Today, to break the rut I've been in on the stuckened stories, I went back to one of my Clarion stories. My week six story, to be precise, the one about the shedding. It's been sitting on my hard-drive, comments entered in, and a third of it revised, since January. (Well, since February last year, technically; although I don't know when I got all the comments entered. That stuff takes forever.) Because it needed one or two new scenes, and I could come up with snippets of them but I couldn't get any further. Today I figured out how to shoehorn one of the new scenes in to the current arc, and so I am happy 8)

Things rise and fall for no reason. And what a great opportunity that is! You can start writing again at any minute.

Natalie Goldberg, Writing Down the Bones

  1. All of my Clarion teachers would like me to add the qualifier as long as it leads to writing. Natch. []
May 282006
 

Today, all I want to do is watch Garden State. Sadly, I do not have a copy of it handy, and so looks like I'll be thwarted in that want yet another day.

Also today, after an hour and a half spent fighting for words during which I spectacularly achieved zero, count them zero, I gave up on the writing for a bit and sat down with Natalie Goldberg's Writing Down the Bones. It's been on my shelf for a whiles now, but since I'm also reading another book on the craft of writing, I had been intending to steer clear of more tomes of advice. There's only so much reading fiction and reading about writing you can do and still keep a balance of getting your own writing done.

And now I'm wishing I'd picked this book up aeons ago. I sat and read for nearly two hours, and I would've made it further than halfway if I'd let myself stop and simply read — but I couldn't, I had to keep stopping to scribble down snippets. To reinforce them, and to keep them for later.

Very early in the book, in talking about writing practice, Goldberg states:

When you write, don't say "I'm going to write a poem." That attitude will freeze you right away. Sit down with the least expectation of yourself; say "I am free to write the worst junk in the world." You have to give yourself permission to write a lot without a destination.

(emphasis mine)

I've seen this advice before, in the form of Give yourself permission to write a shit first draft — but that last line, about writing without a destination, suddenly unpacked a whole new level of this advice for me. Writing a cruddy first draft is all very well, because it's not about deliberately sitting down to write crud: it's about writing through self-doubts and lack of trust and perspective.

But lately it hasn't been working so fully for me, and Goldberg's snippet above unpacked why. Because letting myself write crap isn't my current rut. It's writing to a (frustratingly, stubbornly unknown) destination that's got me stuck at the moment.

My first novel was easy (said with hindsight ;) ) in that I knew the ending, and had only to cast backwards to find a beginning which would lead up to it. The current second novel (both of them ;) ) have only given me the beginning, and refuse to cough up more. Every short story I have on the burner at the moment is playing the same cat and mouse game.

So it's time for one of those insidious and yet oh-so-helpful little writers lies. I'll take up Goldberg's practice writing, for a half-hour or so a day after work; and then when I sit down to the proper wordcount, I'll tell myself that I'm writing entirely without a destination and any direction will do. And if the sneaky, snarky backbrain starts whispering sly truths about that nebulous outline lurking on my hard-drive, I shall turn up the iPod so I can't hear it.

It is important to have a way worked out to begin your writing; otherwise, washing the dishes will become the most important thing on earth — anything that will divert you from writing. Finally one just has to shut up, sit down, and write. That is painful. Writing is so simple, basic, and austere. There are no fancy gadgets to make it more attractive. Our monkey minds would much rather discuss our resistances with a friend at a lovely restaurant or go to a therapist to work out our writing blocks. We like to complicate simple tasks. There is a Zen saying, "Talk when you talk, walk when you walk, and die when you die." Write when you write. Stop battling yourself with guilt, accusations, and strong-arm threats.

May 272006
 

The problem with the whole getting up early to write schtick is that I can only give the writing an hour, sometimes a smidgeon more. Which means that, while I definitely get wordcount every day, cutting it off at the one-hour mark means I don't get prodigious counts. I always plan on writing more when I get home in the evening, and some days I do, but most days I'm pretty weary from getting up stupidly early and by the time I've eaten and chored and whatnot, it's time to hit the hay. I suppose I could start skimping on sleep, but then I wouldn't be Deb and you all might start to wonder if the world had gone topsy-turvy.

So I end the day feeling thwarted, as if I could have done so much more than I did. Of course, if I didn't get up early in the morning, I'd be theoretically able to give more than an hour to my writing, but I doubt I'd actually squeeze in that much. So feel free to ignore me as much as I do. I never claimed to be rational, you know.

In happy news, I went for a walk at lunch yesterday. Why oh why have I spent so long sitting in that freezing, boring work kitchen? East of the kitchen, protected by a long bed of trees and shrubs and a rock wall, is a sward. I kid you not, a sward. Private and sunny and everything. (Well, private except for the kookaburras who figured my tomato and cheese sandwich was communal property and kept dive-bombing me to get at it.) There's even a lone tree in the middle of the lawn, turned golden with autumn. It's discoveries like these that make me happy for ridiculously long stretches of time. I sat there in sunlight, bright and glorious1, thinking nothing could be better. But then a cloud covered the sun, dimming everything, and a brisk wind made the leaves shiver and whisper, and how could anything be better than that?

In news that shouldn't surprise me and yet still does, in four weeks I'll be an aunt. I mean, it's not like I haven't had plenty of time to grow accustomed to the idea. Still: surprising.

  1. For the northern hemispherical types: yes, it's nearly winter over here. No, winter doesn't mean indoors weather. It's summer that's full of storms and rain; winter is brisk but mostly sunny. It is, if you're a cold frog like me, a wondrous time of year. []
 Posted by at 6:45 pm  Tagged with:

26 may

 journal  Comments Off
May 262006
 

Amusement of the day: a van with express stencilled on its side, which never broke over 30 k/h. (Although after 5km stuck behind said van, it became less an amusement and more an irritation.)

May 212006
 

If you're looking for content, this is not it. I've been quiet for the past few days and — I swear it's true, that girl is evil — it's Tessa's fault. She's given me a minefield of cover songs. I love me my cover songs. I am now surrounded and happily drowning in fifty versions of the same song. Life is good, sometimes.

So, things I've realised over the past couple of days:

First, my cat can quack. I shit you not. It's not in his conscious control, but there you have it.

Second, The Righteous Brothers did not write Unchained Melody. Colour me slightly less ignorant now.

Also, the gag reel on the Australian release of Firefly is not the same as that on the American release. This displeases me mightily, because the Australian release seems to have a whole gobload less. I wouldn't mind if we had more, but come on. Less? Especially when that less apparently involves Zoe and Mal shimmying? At least we seemed to get the same gagreel for Serenity, but that doesn't mean I'm mollified.

Again with the Firefly: Jayne is so very quotable, ain't he?

Finally (just for Tess and Suzanne): I stopped for lunch yesterday when every word I typed had at least one (and more usually three) letter k's. Seriously. Fifty pages of the letter k. ;) 1

I'll be in my bunk.

  1. Yes, it's an in-joke. Yes, you had to be there. Trust me, it's not even that funny for those who were. It's just a catchcry, really. Up there with Shut your mouf! []
May 162006
 

And lo, the 'flubug hung on for yet another day. The good news is that I'm not so dizzy anymore, so I'm hoping this is my last day off sick. The even better news is that my CDBaby CDs arrived in the post today. It's Tessa's fault. She told me about the site and I couldn't leave with my credit cards unscathed.

The closest I can come to content today is a link: Jeff VanderMeer has an interesting post on when not to write. This shall henceforth be my mantra when the guilt-monkey gets obstreperous.

what's your quirk?

 asides, journal  Comments Off
May 132006
 

Agent Nephele Tempest muses about voice:

So, what's your writing style? You should know, and keep track as it evolves. Agents and editors talk about voice a lot, and the truth is that we're talking about two different things at the same time: what your writing tone and style are, and what your narrator or characters sound like. These things combine to give your story its voice–that sound, rhythm, personality that resonates in your head as you read. It's great to have a voice that's unique. You need to guard against falling into the trap of always using that signature vocabulary word or funky sentence structure you really love, though, because too much of that will make your writing all blend together and seem the same.